The ongoing fallout from the UK's Horizon scandal, which saw numerous postal workers wrongly accused of theft and fraud based on flawed accounting software, is casting a long shadow over the admissibility and interpretation of digital evidence in legal proceedings. A leading forensics professor in Canada is now highlighting the inherent complexities and potential pitfalls of relying heavily on digital evidence, drawing parallels to the issues that plagued the Horizon case.
The Horizon scandal exposed the dangers of assuming the infallibility of software systems and the challenges of scrutinizing their internal workings, particularly when they are proprietary and opaque. The professor argues that the case serves as a stark reminder that digital evidence, while often perceived as objective and irrefutable, is in fact created, …